- Apple 10 vs adreno 530 android#
- Apple 10 vs adreno 530 software#
- Apple 10 vs adreno 530 plus#
- Apple 10 vs adreno 530 series#
Yes Water resistant (up to 30 minutes in a depth of 1 meter), IP67 Quad core (2.15 GHz, Dual core, Kryo + 1.6 GHz, Dual core, Kryo) Octa core (2.2 GHz, Quad core, Kryo + 1.5 GHz, Quad core, Kryo) Hexa Core (2.39 GHz, Dual core, Monsoon + 1.42 GHz, Quad core, Mistral) Light sensor, Proximity sensor, Accelerometer, Compass, GyroscopeįaceTime, iTunes Store, iBooks, Podcasts, Find My iPhone, Find My Friends.ĤG: Available (supports Indian bands), 3G: Available, 2G: Available The A10 is designed specifically for one thing, the iPhone (and maybe later the iPad).Light sensor, Proximity sensor, Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope
Apple 10 vs adreno 530 series#
And this fits with Qualcomm’s business model, the Snapdragon series are mobile processors that are sold to OEMs to build phones, tablets, set-top boxes, media players, whatever.
Apple 10 vs adreno 530 plus#
The Snapdragon 821 is the more rounded processor since it contains an integrated LTE modem, the same type of modem that is used by the iPhone 7, plus support for quick charging and more graphic APIs (OpenGL ES 3.2 + Vulkan). Clearly both processors are advanced pieces of tech. When taken as a whole package including the CPU, GPU, ISP, DSP, and modem there are pros and cons on both sides. Millions of Qualcomm and Apple processors are being used right now in handsets all across the globe. When playing video both devices uses almost identical amounts of battery power. When playing 3D games the iPhone 7 uses less power, however the GPU is working less (maybe 50% less). It is interesting to note that the iPhone 7 Plus has a bigger battery than the Pixel but the same resolution display. The iPhone has a smaller battery which some might take as proof that it is more power efficient, however it also has a lower resolution display. Unfortunately that means it is hard to definitely declare the winner here.
Apple 10 vs adreno 530 software#
There are various ways to do it including dismantling the phone and connecting lots of wires to the circuit board! However for this test I will try to get an idea using software and a bit of math. Testing the power efficiency of a mobile processor is hard. On mobile that isn’t possible, so it is important to look at the efficiency aspects of both processors. PowerĪs I have mentioned above, it is possible to create a high performance processor if you can afford to use lots of energy and you have a way to dissipate the heat.
Apple 10 vs adreno 530 android#
So why do my C language benchmarks show a clear victory for the Snapdragon 821? There are a number of possible answers: a) The C compiler in the Android NDK is better than the C compiler in Xcode, or b) due to the HMP nature of both processors then it is possible that the “big” cores on the A10 didn’t get a chance to run and the tests executed on the smaller cores, or c) there are some unknown performance optimizations that normally run that didn’t kick-in, or d) there is something wrong with my iOS app (as I am not that familiar with iOS app development). There are various equations that specify the relationship between power and performance, the most notable being P=CV^2f, where P is Power, C is the capacitance of the process node, V is voltage (in this case raised to the power of 2) and f is the frequency. The greater the performance the more power is used.
They key thing to remember is that energy efficiency and performance are not friends. Before we dive in there are a few things we need to understand. This is one of the most hotly debated processor topics, not only on mobile but on the desktop, in servers and on supercomputers. 3 out of 4 iPhone 7 models use modems from Qualcomm. Second, the Snapdragon 821 includes Qualcomm’s X12 LTE modem whereas the A10 Fusion doesn’t have a built-in modem, instead it uses third party modems on auxiliary chips. First, the Snapdragon 821 supports Qualcomm’s Quick Charge 3.0 technology, which allows handset makers to offer fast charging in their handsets (upto 18W), whereas Apple doesn’t yet support any kind of fast charging. There are two more differences worth mentioning.